{"id":5658,"date":"2026-09-25T09:01:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T09:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sportbulletin.top\/?p=5658"},"modified":"2026-09-25T09:01:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T09:01:00","slug":"%f0%9f%9a%a8-europes-top-4-leagues-call-for-fifa-reform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sportbulletin.top\/?p=5658","title":{"rendered":"\ud83d\udea8 Europe\u2019s top 4 leagues call for FIFA reform"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Another blow for Gianni Infantino.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A huge statement was jointly published by Europe\u2019s four major leagues this Friday morning!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n

The Premier League, Serie A<\/a>, La Liga and the Bundesliga<\/a> have indeed taken a joint stand this Friday morning, calling for reform at FIFA<\/a> just months before the next elections.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In the crosshairs: Gianni Infantino and his stillborn controversial plan to commercialize the World Cup, dubbed FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), which envisaged opening up FIFA\u2019s commercial activities to private investors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u26bd To Unify the Game, FIFA Must Reform<\/p>\n

@Bundesliga_DE, @LaLiga , @SerieA and the @premierleague call for a fundamental reform of its governance: genuine participation, decisions based on objective data and a separation between its regulatory and commercial functions.<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u2013\u00a0

\n
\n

“The World Cup may be the pinnacle of our sport, but the foundations of football are sustained week after week, in packed stadiums and local communities, through the commitment of players, supporters, clubs and leagues around the world.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

These long-standing foundations of football have been threatened in recent years by a fundamental governance problem: the FIFA president has actively promoted exploitative ideas instead of opposing them. And although football stakeholders ultimately forced the withdrawal of the \u2018FIFA Forward Enterprise\u2019 (FFE) program, the conditions that led to the creation of FFE persist.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The FIFA president has now acknowledged the need for reform, but it is not enough to consider superficial procedural changes in the aftermath of FFE: fundamental governance reform is essential to restore clear statutory limits within FIFA, including certainty that individual disciplinary matters remain clearly shielded from any political interference.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

FIFA\u2019s future concerns everyone who cares about football, because our sport cannot grow globally if its foundations are shaken.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

FIFA\u2019s governance problem goes far beyond the role of any one individual. The broader question is whether the FIFA president should simultaneously wield such regulatory, commercial and political power without effective checks and balances, particularly without the agreement of the stakeholders concerned. More than a decade ago, following criminal prosecutions involving senior football officials, the reform process launched by FIFA itself was intended to address these issues \u2014 yet once again, football has suffered one of the most serious abuses of power in FIFA\u2019s history.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

We are speaking out together, as founding members of the European Leagues and the World Leagues Association, because we understand how FIFA\u2019s relentless expansionism affects everyone. Each of us is the custodian of a professional system that connects the grassroots of our sport to elite national and international competitions. By bringing millions of people together, domestic football leagues around the world have a major social and economic impact: they support industries, create jobs and invest in grassroots development, while also generating significant tax revenues for our communities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

About 1% of professional players worldwide take part in the FIFA World Cup, while the other players and their clubs stop playing matches when domestic leagues are suspended. Yet when FIFA makes major unilateral decisions that directly affect us \u2014 for example, by expanding the International Match Calendar (IMC) and extending the periods during which domestic competitions must be suspended \u2014 the stakeholders most affected are not meaningfully involved in the decision-making process. A FIFA governance system that concentrates regulatory, commercial and political power without oversight in a single office, while relegating the affected stakeholders to a merely consultative role, is not fit for purpose.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In recent years, international case law has repeatedly underscored this same point: sports governing bodies may regulate our discipline, but their power is not unlimited. When FIFA seeks to organize competitions, it must also neutralize any inherent conflict of interest through transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate rules and criteria, adopted inclusively and subject to effective independent review.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The complaint lodged by the leagues with the European Commission in October 2024 regarding the IMC stems from a flawed governance framework, under which FIFA can use its regulatory power to serve its own commercial objectives without regard for the impact on the economic and social viability of domestic competitions, which affects all stakeholders.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

This must change now, for the good of football.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

We therefore jointly call for a new governance structure for the global governing body of our sport that is transparent, objective, proportionate and inclusive, and that rests on three fundamental commitments. We call on FIFA to:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

1. Give affected stakeholders a genuine role in decision-making<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

FIFA must establish a permanent body representing the main stakeholders, including national associations, leagues, clubs, and male and female football players. This new body must be fully informed of new initiatives and play a meaningful role in FIFA\u2019s decision-making process. The agreement of the stakeholder groups directly affected by a decision must be required for decisions concerning, among other things, the calendar, employment, competitions and football\u2019s core assets.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

2. Ensure evidence-based decision-making<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Any major FIFA proposal must be supported by a clearly defined rationale, evidence to back it up, and an independent assessment, published before any decision is made, covering players, clubs, leagues and supporters, and assessing the impact on all stakeholders as well as on the development of football. Different options must be thoroughly considered and final decisions must be accompanied by publicly available explanations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3. Separate FIFA\u2019s role as regulator from its commercial function<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

FIFA\u2019s role as football\u2019s regulator and guardian must be protected from its commercial function, as organizer of global competitions, by strong institutional safeguards designed to preserve trust, legitimacy and accountability. The bodies responsible for ethics, financial oversight and elections must have appointments, budgets and powers that are genuinely independent from FIFA\u2019s administration and the presidency. These reforms will ensure that FIFA\u2019s core competition rights, including the World Cup, are managed in the interests of football as a whole.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

At this crucial time for our sport, we encourage FIFA presidential candidates to endorse these principles and, within the first 100 days of the next presidential term, convene a Governance Convention chaired by an independent figure, representing the member associations and the wider football community, tasked with publicly reporting on its work within six months.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

All FIFA presidential candidates should publish their own reform program, debate its contents, and comply with fair election rules. FIFA\u2019s financial, legal, communications and marketing resources, as well as its football development funds, must remain strictly neutral and must never constitute an electoral advantage for any candidate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

We invite confederations, national associations, leagues, clubs, players\u2019 unions, supporters\u2019 groups and public authorities on every continent to join this cause by supporting these principles.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The time has come to decide not only who will lead FIFA, but also how it should be led. The leagues have a crucial role to play in this process, and we want to ensure that the voice of each of them is heard.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Football needs a strong FIFA. But that strength must go hand in hand with accountability. FIFA\u2019s authority can only stem from shared responsibility, acceptance of rigorous scrutiny, and earned trust.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in \ud83c\uddeb\ud83c\uddf7 here.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\ud83d\udcf8 Sam Hodde – 2026 Getty Images<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"\"View publisher imprint<\/a>